DAVINCI CLASSIC DECKS
International Paper
Mark For: DAVINCI CLASSIC DECKS™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 76262749 |
| Mark Literal Elements | DAVINCI CLASSIC DECKS |
| Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
| Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
| Standard Character Claim | No |
| Register | PRINCIPAL |
| Current Location | FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) 2004-05-24 |
| Basis | 1(b) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | No |
| Current Use | No |
| Intent To Use | Yes |
| Filed ITU | Yes |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Attorney Name | Mitchell E. Radin, Esq. |
| Attorney Docket Number | 9653/1927 |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | FRENCH, CURTIS W |
Timeline
| 2001-05-24 | Application Filed |
| 2003-03-11 | Published |
| 2003-03-11 | Published for Opposition |
| 2003-12-04 | Abandon |
| 2003-12-04 | Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all docume |
| 2003-12-04 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2004-05-24 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  International Paper |
| Address | 400 Atlantic Street Stamford, CONNECTICUT UNITED STATES 06921 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NEW YORK |
Documents
 Application | 2001-05-24 | |
| Drawing | 2001-05-24 | |
| Duplicate Application | 2001-05-24 | |
| Duplicate Drawing | 2001-05-24 | |
| XSearch Search Summary | 2001-08-15 | |
| Offc Action Outgoing | 2001-08-16 | |
| Response to Office Action | 2002-02-14 | |
| Unclassified-Other | 2002-04-05 | |
| Suspension Letter | 2002-04-30 | |
| Unclassified-Other | 2003-01-21 | |
| Notice of Publication | 2003-02-19 | |
| Notice of Publication | APPLICATION/XML | 2003-02-19 |
| Notice of Allowance | APPLICATION/XML | 2003-05-23 |
| Notice of Allowance | 2003-06-03 | |
| File Jacket | 2004-05-10 | |
| Notice of Abandonment | 2004-05-21 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
(ABANDONED)
IC 019. US 001 012 033 050. G & S: Non-metallic building materials, namely composite wood and plastic molded products, namely boards, balusters, rails, posts, planks, rails, decking, fencing, for use in the construction of decks
| International Codes: | 19 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,012,033,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "DECKS" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | 2004-05-21 | |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-05-11 | |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2003-06-03 | |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-03-11 | |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-02-19 | |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-01-11 | |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2002-04-30 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-02-14 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-08-16 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-08-15 | 76419 |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-07-25 | 78303 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 