Response to Office Action

QUICK FIX

Quick Fix AS

Response to Office Action

PTO Form 1966 (Rev 9/2002)
OMB Control #0651-0050 (Exp. 04/30/2006)

Response to Office Action


The table below presents the data as entered.

Input Field
Entered
SERIAL NUMBER 76229938
MARK SECTION (no change)
ARGUMENT(S)
The Examining Attorney has requested the status of the relevant foreign registration.  The Norwegian home application no. 200011476 of Sept 25, 2000 remains pending and has not yet issued.  Therefore, the suspension should be continued.

Applicant realizes this is not a response to a substantive refusal, but their appears to be no other category in the PTO Form Response which allows the Applicant to respond to a Suspension Inquiry.  If Applicant has overlooked the proper format, our apologies are extended.  If not, we suggest that a field for this purpose be added.

Respectfully submitted,
/Martin R Greenstein/
Martin R. Greenstein
Attorney for Applicant
TechMark a Law Corporation
55 So. Market St., Sixteenth Floor
San Jose, CA 95113-2327
SIGNATURE SECTION
SIGNATURE /Martin R Greenstein/
SIGNATORY NAME Martin R. Greenstein
SIGNATORY POSITION Attorney for Applicant
SIGNATORY DATE 06/09/2004
FILING INFORMATION SECTION
SUBMIT DATE Wed Jun 09 17:29:27 EDT 2004
TEAS STAMP USPTO/OA-XXXXXXXXXXXX-200
40609172927455170-7622993
8-20046eb666e327e95f8ab64
2e72c20611a-N-N-200406091
72851877925



PTO Form 1966 (Rev 9/2002)
OMB Control #0651-0050 (Exp. 04/30/2006)

Response to Office Action


To the Commissioner for Trademarks:

Application serial no. 76229938 is amended as follows:    
        
Argument(s)
In response to the substantive refusal(s), please note the following:
The Examining Attorney has requested the status of the relevant foreign registration.  The Norwegian home application no. 200011476 of Sept 25, 2000 remains pending and has not yet issued.  Therefore, the suspension should be continued.

Applicant realizes this is not a response to a substantive refusal, but their appears to be no other category in the PTO Form Response which allows the Applicant to respond to a Suspension Inquiry.  If Applicant has overlooked the proper format, our apologies are extended.  If not, we suggest that a field for this purpose be added.

Respectfully submitted,
/Martin R Greenstein/
Martin R. Greenstein
Attorney for Applicant
TechMark a Law Corporation
55 So. Market St., Sixteenth Floor
San Jose, CA 95113-2327
        
Response Signature
        
Signature: /Martin R Greenstein/     Date: 06/09/2004
Signatory's Name: Martin R. Greenstein
Signatory's Position: Attorney for Applicant
        
        
        
Serial Number: 76229938
Internet Transmission Date: Wed Jun 09 17:29:27 EDT 2004
TEAS Stamp: USPTO/OA-XXXXXXXXXXXX-200406091729274551
70-76229938-20046eb666e327e95f8ab642e72c
20611a-N-N-20040609172851877925




uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed