Offc Action Outgoing

GUARD DAWG

Steel King Industries, Inc.

U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2558079 - GUARD DAWG - 12598.6US01

To: Steel King Industries, Inc. (dockmpls@merchantgould.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2558079 - GUARD DAWG - 12598.6US01
Sent: August 26, 2022 12:41:42 PM
Sent As: prg@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Owner’s Trademark Registration

 

U.S. Registration No. 2558079

 

Mark:  GUARD DAWG

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

       Christopher J. Schulte

       MERCHANT & GOULD, P.C.

       P.O. BOX 2910

       MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402-0910

      

 

 

 

 

 

Owner:  Steel King Industries, Inc.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 12598.6US01        

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

       dockmpls@merchantgould.com

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

 

The USPTO must receive the owner’s response to this letter within the time period specified below.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears below.

 

Issue date:  August 26, 2022

 

 

The Combined Section 8 Affidavit & Section 9 Renewal Application was received on March 8, 2022.  The Section 9 portion of the combined filing can be granted.  However, the Section 8 portion is not accepted for the reason(s) set forth below.

 

ISSUES PERTAINING TO SECTION 8 PORTION ONLY

 

I.                    SPECIMEN DEFICIENCY

 

The owner of the registration provided a specimen with its Section 8 Affidavit; however, although the specimen is identified as a catalog or web page, it is unacceptable to show trademark use as a display associated with the goods because it fails to include the necessary ordering information/a weblink for ordering the goods and thus, appears to be mere advertising material.  See In re Sones, 590 F.3d 1282, 1288-89, 93 USPQ2d 1118, 1123-24 (Fed. Cir. 2009); In re Genitope Corp., 78 USPQ2d 1819, 1822 (TTAB 2006); In re Dell Inc., 71 USPQ2d 1725, 1727-29 (TTAB 2004); TMEP §904.03(h), (i); cf. Lands’ End, Inc. v. Manbeck, 797 F. Supp. 511, 513-14, 24 USPQ2d 1314, 1316 (E.D. Va. 1992). 

 

Material that functions merely to tell prospective purchasers about the goods, or to promote the sale of the goods, is not acceptable to show trademark use.  TMEP §904.04(b).  Leaflets, handbills, brochures, advertising circulars and other advertising material, while normally acceptable for showing use in connection with services, generally are not acceptable specimens for showing trademark use in connection with goods.  See In re MediaShare Corp., 43 USPQ2d 1304, 1307 (TTAB 1997); In re Schiapparelli Searle, 26 USPQ2d 1520, 1522 (TTAB 1993); TMEP §§904.04(b), (c), 1301.04.

 

A printed or web catalog, web page or similar specimen is acceptable to show trademark use as a display associated with the goods only if it includes the following:  (1) a picture of the relevant goods or a textual description that identifies the actual features or inherent characteristics of the goods such that the goods are recognizable, (2) the mark appearing sufficiently near the picture or textual description of the goods so as to associate the mark with the goods, and (3) information necessary to order the goods (e.g., an order form or a phone number, mailing address, or e-mail address for placing orders) or a visible weblink to order the goods.  See In re Sones, 590 F.3d at 1288-89, 93 USPQ2d at 1123-24; In re Genitope, 78 USPQ2d at 1822; In re Dell, 71 USPQ2d at 1727-29; Lands’ End, 797 F. Supp. at 513-14, 24 USPQ2d at 1316; TMEP §904.03(h).  Without this necessary information, the specimen is mere advertising and is not acceptable to show use in commerce for goods.  See, e.g., In re Osterberg, 83 USPQ2d 1220, 1222-24 (TTAB 2007); In re Genitope, 78 USPQ2d at 1822. 

 

The owner may respond by submitting:

 

(1) A substitute specimen showing current use of the registered mark in commerce for each class of goods specified in the registration; and

 

(2) The following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute specimen was in use in commerce during the relevant period for filing the 10-year Section 8.”  37 C.F.R. §2.161(a)(7); TMEP §1604.12(c).

 

Examples of specimens.  Electronic specimens may be an image, such as a photograph or scanned copy, of the physical specimen. Specimens for goods include an image of (1) the actual goods bearing the mark; (2) labels or tags shown attached to the goods or including informational matter that typically appears on a tag or label in use in commerce for these types of goods; (3) an actual container or packaging for the goods bearing the mark; or (4) a point-of-sale display showing the mark directly associated with the goods.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c); TMEP §904.03(a)-(m).  A webpage specimen submitted as a display associated with the goods must show the mark in association with a picture or textual description of the goods and include information necessary for ordering the goods.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c); TMEP §904.03(i).  Any webpage printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen must include the webpage’s URL and the date it was accessed or printed.  37 C.F.R. §2.56(c).

 

II.                  DECLARATION AND SIGNATURE

 

The following statement and declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 can be used to verify the Section 8 Affidavit, if properly signed and dated:

 

The owner was using the mark in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services identified in the registration for which use of the mark in commerce is claimed, as evidenced by the submitted specimen, during the relevant period for filing the 10-year Section 8.

 

The undersigned, being hereby warned that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine or imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C. §1001, and that such willful false statement may jeopardize the validity of this document, declares that s/he is properly authorized to execute this document on behalf of the owner, and all statements made of his/her own knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are believed to be true.

 

__________________________

Signature of Authorized Person

__________________________

Type or Print Name

__________________________

Date

 

The following persons are properly authorized to sign a Section 8 Affidavit on behalf of the owner:

(1) A person with legal authority to bind the owner (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner);

(2) A person with firsthand knowledge of the facts and actual or implied authority to act on behalf of the owner; or

(3)  An authorized attorney who has an actual written or verbal power of attorney or an implied power of attorney from the owner.

37 C.F.R. §§2.161(a)(2), 2.193(e)(1); TMEP §1604.08(a).

 

III.                SIGNATURES ON RESPONSES

 

Responses to Office actions must be properly signed.  37 C.F.R. §§2.163(b), 2.193(e)(2); TMEP §611.03(b).  When an owner is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response.  37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(i); TMEP §611.03(b).  The only attorneys who may sign responses and otherwise practice before the USPTO in trademark matters are (1) attorneys in good standing with a bar of the highest court of any U.S. state, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and other federal territories and possessions of the United States; and (2) Canadian agents/attorneys reciprocally recognized by the USPTO’s Office of Enrollment and Discipline (OED) who are appointed in connection with a U.S.-licensed attorney.  See 37 C.F.R. 2.17(a), 11.14(a), (c), (e).  Attorneys who fail to meet these requirements, as well as non-attorneys, are generally not permitted to represent owners in trademark matters before the USPTO; and thus, they may not sign responses.  See 5 U.S.C. §500(b), (d); 37 C.F.R. §11.14(a)-(c), (e); TMEP §§602, 602.02, 608.01. 

 

Where an owner is represented by an attorney, and then later retains a different attorney from a different firm, the newly retained attorney may not sign responses until the owner files a new power and/or revocation of attorney.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.18(a)(7); TMEP §604.03.

 

Where an owner is not represented by an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual owner or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic owner (e.g., a corporate officer or general partner).  See 37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §§611.03(b), 611.06 et seq.  In the case of joint owners, all must sign.  37 C.F.R. §2.193(e)(2)(ii); TMEP §611.06(a).

 

IV.               RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

RESPONSE TIME DEADLINE:  A complete response must be received within 6 months from the issuance date of this Office action.  The owner must respond to all inquiries set forth in this Office action to avoid cancellation of the registration.  If a response is not received, the registration will be cancelled in its entirety.  37 C.F.R. §2.163(b)-(c); TMEP §1604.16.

 

DEFICIENCY SURCHARGE REQUIRED:  The owner must submit a $100 deficiency surcharge with its response to this Office action.  .  37 C.F.R. §§2.6, 2.164(a)(1); TMEP §1604.17(a).

 

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a Response to Post-Registration Office action. 

 

Direct questions about this Office action to the Post Registration staff member below.

 

 

      /Burns Jr, Glenn R/

    Trademark Specialist

    Phone: 571-272-0994

    Fax: 571-273-0994

   Glenn.Burns@USPTO.gov

 

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an owner’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2558079 - GUARD DAWG - 12598.6US01

To: Steel King Industries, Inc. (dockmpls@merchantgould.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Registration No. 2558079 - GUARD DAWG - 12598.6US01
Sent: August 26, 2022 12:41:42 PM
Sent As: prg@uspto.gov
Attachments:





United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)


USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE


Office action (Official Letter) or Notice has issued
on 08/26/2022 for
U.S. Trademark Application Ser./Registration No. 2558079


A USPTO staff member has reviewed your trademark document and issued an Office action or notice. You may be required to respond to this Office action or notice. Follow the steps below.

(1) Read the Office action or notice. This email is NOT the Office action or notice.

(2) Respond to the Office action or notice, if a response is required. Respond by the deadline using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). Your response must be received by the USPTO on or before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of the last day of the response period. Otherwise, your application may be abandoned or registration may be cancelled and/or expired and/or your document rejected. See the Office action or notice itself regarding how to respond.

(3) Direct general questions about using USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application or registration maintenance process, the status of your application or registration, and whether there are outstanding deadlines to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

After reading the Office action or notice, address any question(s) regarding the specific content to the USPTO staff member identified in the Office action or notice.



GENERAL GUIDANCE

  • Beware of trademark-related scams. Protect yourself from people and companies that may try to take financial advantage of you. Private companies may call you and pretend to be the USPTO or may send you communications that resemble official USPTO documents to trick you. We will never request your credit card number or social security number over the phone. And all official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain "@uspto.gov." Verify the correspondence originated from us by using your application serial number or registration number in our database, TSDR, to confirm that it appears under the "Documents" tab, or contact the Trademark Assistance Center.

  • Hiring a U.S.-licensed attorney. If you do not have an attorney and are not required to have one under the trademark rules, we encourage you to hire a U.S.-licensed attorney specializing in trademark law to help guide you through the registration or registration maintenance process.



uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed