UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
SERIAL NO: 76/067365
APPLICANT: British Medical Association
|
|
CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS: SHELDON R. MEYER FLIESLER DUBB MEYER & LOVEJOY LLP 4 EMBARCADERO CTR STE 400 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94111-4156
|
RETURN ADDRESS: Commissioner for Trademarks 2900 Crystal Drive Arlington, VA 22202-3514 ecom112@uspto.gov
|
MARK: BMA
|
|
CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO: 23910
CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS:
|
Please provide in all correspondence:
1. Filing date, serial number, mark and applicant's name. 2. Date of this Office Action. 3. Examining Attorney's name and Law Office number. 4. Your telephone number and e-mail address.
|
Serial Number 76/067365
The assigned examining attorney has reviewed the statement of use filed on May 15, 2003 and has determined the following.
The Office has reassigned this application to the undersigned examining attorney.
The examining attorney has reviewed the statement of use and has determined that the following issues are outstanding.
With respect to international class 35, the specimen is unacceptable because it is illegible and does not clearly refer to the services.
With respect to international class 42, the specimen is unacceptable as evidence of actual service mark use because the specimens are showing use for arranging and conducting conferences which are services in class 41. Acceptable specimens for class 42 as recited would include a specimen that refers to the provision of facilities for hosting conferences or specimens that refer to the applicant’s medical research and medical services or the applicant’s legal services. TMEP §904.05.
The applicant must submit a specimen showing the mark as it is used in commerce for the services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.56 and 2.88(b)(2). Examples of acceptable specimens are signs, photographs, brochures or advertisements that show the mark used in the sale or advertising of the services. TMEP §1301.04. The applicant must verify, with an affidavit or a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20, that the substitute specimen was in use in commerce prior to the expiration of the time allowed to the applicant for filing a statement of use. 37 C.F.R. §2.59(b); TMEP §904.09.
If an amendment of the dates‑of‑use clause is necessary in order to state the correct dates of first use, the applicant must verify the amendment with an affidavit or a declaration in accordance with 37 C.F.R. §2.20. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(c); TMEP §903.05.
If the applicant has any questions or needs assistance in responding to this Office action, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
/D. Beryl Gardner/
D. Beryl Gardner
Examining Attorney - LO 112
410/997-6378
703/308-9112 x180
www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html (file responses)
beryl.gardner@uspto (submit questions only)
How to respond to this Office Action:
To respond formally using the Office’s Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/teas/index.html and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via E-mail, visit http://www.gov.uspto.report/web/trademarks/tmelecresp.htm and follow the instructions.
To respond formally via regular mail, your response should be sent to the mailing Return Address listed above and include the serial number, law office and examining attorney’s name on the upper right corner of each page of your response.
FOR INQUIRIES OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS OFFICE ACTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSIGNED EXAMINING ATTORNEY.