INFUSION
Graham Webb International Limited Partnership
Mark For: INFUSION® trademark registration is intended to cover the category of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 76036167 |
| Registration Number | 2549115 |
| Mark Literal Elements | INFUSION |
| Mark Drawing Type | 1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S) |
| Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
| Standard Character Claim | No |
| Register | PRINCIPAL |
| Current Location | SCANNING ON DEMAND 2007-05-22 |
| Basis | 1(a) |
| Class Status | SECTION 8 - CANCEL |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | Yes |
| Current Use | Yes |
| Intent To Use | No |
| Filed ITU | No |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | M. John Carson |
| Law Office Assigned | L70 |
| Employee Name | FINE, STEVEN R |
Timeline
| 1991-03-19 | Date of First Use |
| 1991-03-19 | Date of Use In Commerce |
| 2000-04-27 | Application Filed |
| 2001-12-25 | Published |
| 2001-12-25 | Published for Opposition |
| 2002-03-19 | Trademark Registered |
| 2007-05-22 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2008-12-27 | Cancelled |
| 2008-12-27 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2008-12-27 | Status: Registration cancelled because registrant did not file an acceptable declaration under Section 8. To view all documents in this |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  Graham Webb International Limited Partnership |
| Address | 5823 Newton Drive Carlsbad, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 92008 |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Partnership |
| Legal Entity State | MINNESOTA |
Documents
 Application | IMAGE/TIFF | 2000-04-27 |
| Drawing | IMAGE/TIFF | 2000-04-27 |
| Specimen | IMAGE/TIFF | 2000-04-27 |
 Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2001-02-26 | |
| Registration Certificate | 2002-03-19 | |
| Registration Certificate | 2002-03-19 | |
| Paper Correspondence Incoming | 2002-10-16 | |
| File Jacket | 2007-05-17 | |
| Specimen | 2007-05-17 | |
| Unclassified | 2007-05-17 | |
| TEAS Rev, App and/or COA of Atty/Dom.Rep | 2007-09-05 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
(CANCELLED)
IC 003. US 001 004 006 050 051 052. G & S: HAIR THICKENING SHAMPOO AND CONDITIONER. FIRST USE: 19910319. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19910319
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,004,006,050,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0031 | HAIR THICKENING SHAMPOO AND CONDITIONER |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2008-12-27 | |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-09-05 | |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-09-05 | |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-05-22 | |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2006-08-11 | 59315 |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-10-16 | |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-03-19 | |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2001-12-25 | |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2001-12-05 | |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2001-05-09 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-02-26 | |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-10-23 | |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-09-29 | 63031 |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 