Reconsideration Letter

CARLTON

Carlton Communications Plc

Reconsideration Letter

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE

 

    SERIAL NO: 76/035181

 

    APPLICANT:                          Carlton Communications Plc

 

 

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT ADDRESS:

    PETER M. EICHLER

    CROSBY HEAFEY ROACH & MAY PC

    1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 700

    LOS ANGELES CA  90067-6009

   

RETURN ADDRESS: 

Commissioner for Trademarks

2900 Crystal Drive

Arlington, VA 22202-3514

ecom113@uspto.gov

 

 

If no fees are enclosed, the address should include the words "Box Responses - No Fee."

    MARK:          CARLTON

 

 

 

    CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:   3353-2

 

    CORRESPONDENT EMAIL ADDRESS: 

 

Please provide in all correspondence:

 

1.  Filing date, serial number, mark and

     applicant's name.

2.  Date of this Office Action.

3.  Examining Attorney's name and

     Law Office number.

4.  Your telephone number and e-mail address..

 

 

 

Serial Number 76/035181

 

DENIAL OF THE REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

 

Applicant is requesting reconsideration of a final refusal dated August 30, 2002.

 

After careful consideration of the law and facts of the case, the examining attorney must deny the request for reconsideration as to the amendment to the recitation of services and adhere to the final action as written.  The amendment does not identify the services so that the wording of the services are acceptable and comply with the Office’s Identification Manual.  The following extracts are unacceptable:

 

“providing information and digital data all relating to advertising” and “distributorship services in the field of pre-recorded videotapes [italicized services are beyond the scope of original recitation and must be deleted]” International Class 35;

 

“provision of entertainment information in the field of motion pictures, music, and videotapes, on-line from electronic communications networks, or a computer network or the global information computer network” in International Class 41.

 

Accordingly, applicant’s request for reconsideration is denied.  The time for appeal runs from the date the final action was mailed.  37 C.F.R. Section 2.64(b); TMEP Section 715.03(c).  Here, because the applicant has not timely filed a notice of appeal (the notice of appeal was due on March 3, 2003, or with the petition to revive, and there is not one in the record) this application stands ABANDONED. 

 

 

 

 

/Christopher L. Buongiorno/

Law Office 113

(703) 308-9113  ext. 460

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed