NATURALLY AGED NO PRESERVATIVE LABATT CRYSTAL COOL CLEAR LAGER
Labatt Brewing Company Limited
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75906260 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Domestic Representative | Helen Hill Minsker |
| Attorney Name | Helen Hill Minsker |
| Attorney Docket Number | 2627H021 |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | FLETCHER, TRACY L |
Timeline
| 2000-01-31 | Application Filed |
| 2003-04-15 | Published for Opposition |
| 2005-03-28 | Abandon |
| 2005-03-28 | Location: TTAB |
| 2005-03-28 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Labatt Brewing Company Limited |
| Address | 181 Bay Street, Suite 200 Toronto, Ontario CA M5J 2T3 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 050101 | Evergreens and other trees or bushes of triangular or conical shape; Pine tree |
| 050325 | Leaf, single; Other leaves |
| 060307 | Waterfalls |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 32 |
| U.S. Codes: | 045,046,048 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "NATURALLY AGED" and "NO PRESERVATIVE" and "COOL CLEAR LAGER" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-06-26 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-07-03 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-07-31 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-12-15 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2001-03-05 | 5 CNSL F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-09-04 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-12-12 | 7 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-04-09 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | 2002-04-09 | 9 1.BD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-01-09 | 10 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-01-09 | 11 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2003-03-26 | 12 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2003-04-15 | 13 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 2003-05-20 | 14 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2003-06-26 | 15 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2003-08-21 | 16 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2004-04-26 | 17 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2005-03-28 | 18 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
| OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2005-03-28 | 19 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | 2005-03-28 | 20 ABN4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | 2005-03-29 | 21 MAB4 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | 2005-04-27 | 22 OP.S T:TTAB Proceeding |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 