CHROMATTE
REFLEC plc
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75858386 |
| Registration Number | 2520975 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Domestic Representative | HART BAXLEY DANIELS & HOLTON |
| Attorney Name | Ronald E. Shapiro |
| Attorney Docket Number | CPA9102 |
| Law Office Assigned | M40 |
| Employee Name | AWRICH, ELLEN |
Timeline
| 1999-11-26 | Application Filed |
| 1999-12-03 | Date of First Use |
| 2000-06-13 | Published for Opposition |
| 2001-12-18 | Trademark Registered |
| 2011-12-18 | Renewal Date |
| 2012-06-05 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
| 2012-06-05 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  REFLEC plc |
| Address | Road 1, Winsford Industrial Estate Winsford Cheshire CW7 3QQ GB |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | GB |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | Projection screens of retroreflective fabrics |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-04-06 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-04-10 | 2 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2000-05-12 | 3 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-06-13 | 4 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2000-09-05 | 5 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2001-03-02 | 6 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2001-03-21 | 7 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-04-11 | 8 CNRT S: |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-08-03 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2001-10-04 | 10 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2001-12-18 | 11 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2006-12-19 | 12 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-12-21 | 13 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-01-08 | 14 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | 2006-12-21 | 15 8.AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2007-03-05 | 16 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 2007-04-13 | 17 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2012-05-23 | 18 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2012-06-05 | 19 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2012-06-05 | 20 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2012-06-05 | 21 RNL1 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2012-06-05 | 22 NA89 E:E-Mail |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2020-12-18 | 23 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2022-07-01 | 24 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 