ACRI-LENS
I-med Pharma Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75702812 |
| Registration Number | 2611143 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 3 |
| Domestic Representative | OBLON, SPIVAK, McCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, P.C. |
| Attorney Name | Jeffrey H. Kaufman |
| Attorney Docket Number | 10267-0001-3 |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | LEVINE, HOWARD B |
Timeline
| 1999-05-11 | Application Filed |
| 2001-11-13 | Published for Opposition |
| 2002-08-27 | Trademark Registered |
| 2010-01-20 | Cancelled |
| 2010-01-20 | Location: TTAB |
| 2010-01-20 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  I-MED PHARMA INC. |
| Address | 216 Brunswick Boulevard Pointe Claire, Pro CA H9R 1A6 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 011508 | Raindrop (a single drop); Single drop (rain, tear, etc.); Teardrop (a single drop) |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 10 |
| U.S. Codes: | 026,039,044 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0101 | Intraocular lens for eye surgery |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-09-01 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-09-03 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-03-03 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2000-05-22 | 4 CNSL F:First Action |
| INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | 2000-11-21 | 5 CNSI O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-02-23 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2001-06-05 | 7 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2001-10-24 | 8 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2001-11-13 | 9 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2002-02-05 | 10 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | 2002-07-04 | 11 IUCN S: |
| Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | 2002-07-04 | 12 1.BD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-08-27 | 13 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-11-29 | 14 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2006-08-15 | 15 CORV P: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-06-21 | 16 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2007-08-21 | 17 PETC T:TTAB Proceeding |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2008-08-04 | 18 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | 2008-08-08 | 19 8.AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2008-08-20 | 20 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 2008-09-10 | 21 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | 2010-01-12 | 22 CANG T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2010-01-20 | 23 CANT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | 2010-01-20 | 24 C18. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 