WOODPLUS2
Magna Design, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75679205 |
| Registration Number | 2570361 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Maureen Burke |
| Attorney Docket Number | 1025-000 |
| Law Office Assigned | M50 |
| Employee Name | BOAGNI, MARY E |
Timeline
| 1999-04-12 | Application Filed |
| 1999-06-25 | Date of First Use |
| 2001-04-24 | Published for Opposition |
| 2002-05-14 | Trademark Registered |
| 2008-02-05 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2012-12-21 | Cancelled |
| 2012-12-21 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Magna Design, Inc. |
| Address | 5804 204th SW Lynnwood WA 98036 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | WA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 20 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,013,022,025,032,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0201 | Office furniture, namely desks, tables, cabinets, credenzas and shelving, constructed with structural panels made of wood products fused with polyester resins |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-09-09 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-09-13 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-12-14 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-09-15 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2000-09-15 | 5 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REINSTATED | 2000-10-10 | 6 REIN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2001-01-26 | 7 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2001-04-11 | 8 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2001-04-24 | 9 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2001-07-17 | 10 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2001-12-21 | 11 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2002-01-22 | 12 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-01-24 | 13 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2002-01-25 | 14 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-05-14 | 15 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-04-27 | 16 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-08-24 | 17 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-09-06 | 18 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-09-06 | 19 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2008-01-04 | 20 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2008-01-07 | 21 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2008-02-05 | 22 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2012-12-21 | 23 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 