PATIENT FRIENDLY MRIS
Fonar Corporation
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75635179 |
| Registration Number | 2560499 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Lawrence I. Lerner |
| Attorney Docket Number | DAMADIAN 10. |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | GOODSAID, IRA J |
Timeline
| 1998-11-29 | Date of First Use |
| 1999-02-05 | Application Filed |
| 2000-09-15 | Amend to Register |
| 2002-04-09 | Trademark Registered |
| 2007-05-14 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2012-11-16 | Cancelled |
| 2012-11-16 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Fonar Corporation |
| Address | 110 Marcus Drive Melville DE 11747 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 37 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,103,106 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| D10000 | "MRIS" |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-07-16 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-07-21 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-11-11 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2000-01-10 | 4 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-07-12 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 2000-10-17 | 6 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 2000-10-18 | 7 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-10-24 | 8 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-10-26 | 9 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-10-26 | 10 CNRT F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-01-05 | 11 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-04-11 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2000-09-15 | 13 IUAF S: |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2001-10-01 | 14 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-09-15 | 15 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 2001-10-04 | 16 IUAA P: |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2001-10-04 | 17 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 2002-04-09 | 18 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-05-28 | 19 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | 2002-05-28 | 20 AMD7 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | 2002-07-23 | 21 PRAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2003-04-09 | 22 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FAX RECEIVED | 2003-07-17 | 23 FAXX I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | 2003-07-21 | 24 PRA7 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2007-05-14 | 25 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2012-11-16 | 26 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 