GREENHOUSE
Kretek Distributors, Incorporated
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75617167 |
| Registration Number | 2737014 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Domestic Representative | Sibona Svede |
| Attorney Name | Kathryn Jennison Shultz |
| Law Office Assigned | L50 |
| Employee Name | BROWN, BRIAN D |
Timeline
| 1999-01-07 | Application Filed |
| 1999-11-30 | Published for Opposition |
| 2003-01-22 | Date of First Use |
| 2003-07-15 | Trademark Registered |
| 2008-07-07 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2010-02-20 | Cancelled |
| 2010-02-20 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  KRETEK DISTRIBUTORS, INCORPORATED |
| Address | 5069 MAUREEN LANE MOORPARK CA 93021 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 34 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,008,009,017 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0341 | CIGAR, CIGARETTES, CIGARILLOS, ASHTRAYS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, CIGAR CUTTERS, CIGARETTE CASES NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, CIGARETTE HOLDERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, CIGARETTE LIGHTERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, PIPES FOR SMOKING, PIPE CLEANERS FOR SMOKING, MATCHES, TOBACCO POUCHES, CIGARETTE ROLLING PAPERS AND TOBACCO |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-06-30 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1999-07-06 | 2 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1999-10-29 | 3 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1999-11-30 | 4 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2000-02-22 | 5 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2000-07-10 | 6 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2000-08-31 | 7 EX1G S: |
| EXTENSION 2 FILED | 2001-01-19 | 8 EXT2 S: |
| EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | 2001-02-25 | 9 EX2G S: |
| EXTENSION 3 FILED | 2001-07-12 | 10 EXT3 S: |
| EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | 2001-09-10 | 11 EX3G S: |
| EXTENSION 4 FILED | 2002-02-22 | 12 EXT4 S: |
| EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | 2002-03-13 | 13 EX4G S: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-08-22 | 14 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 5 FILED | 2002-08-22 | 15 EXT5 S: |
| EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | 2002-09-16 | 16 EX5G S: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-02-24 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2003-02-22 | 18 IUAF S: |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2003-05-16 | 19 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2003-05-20 | 20 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 2003-05-20 | 21 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2003-07-15 | 22 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-07-07 | 23 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2008-09-26 | 24 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2008-09-26 | 25 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2010-02-20 | 26 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 