WIPRO APPLYING THOUGHT
Wipro Trademarks Holding Limited
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75611076 |
| Registration Number | 2392774 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3S19: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Bruce S. Londa |
| Law Office Assigned | M40 |
| Employee Name | HUTTON JR, WILLIAM D |
Timeline
| 1998-04-06 | Date of First Use |
| 1998-12-22 | Application Filed |
| 2000-07-18 | Published for Opposition |
| 2000-10-10 | Trademark Registered |
| 2011-02-02 | Cancelled |
| 2011-02-02 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2011-02-02 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  WIPRO TRADEMARKS HOLDING LIMITED |
| Address | DUPARC TRINITY, 10TH FLOOR IN |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | IN |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 050505 | Daisies |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| DM0000 | The sunflower device comprises adjacent, parallel bands of the colors green, yellow, red, purple and blue. The colored bands are angled from the lower left to the upper right position. The green band is located at the upper left position, and the blue band is located at the lower right position. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-05-10 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-05-18 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-07-23 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1999-09-17 | 4 IUAF S: |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1999-10-21 | 5 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2000-02-02 | 6 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-02-11 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 2000-05-08 | 8 IUAA P: |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-05-08 | 9 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2000-06-16 | 10 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-07-18 | 11 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-10-10 | 12 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-05-12 | 13 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2004-05-21 | 14 PETC T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | 2004-12-07 | 15 CAND T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2004-12-07 | 16 CANT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2006-02-09 | 17 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2010-11-04 | 18 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2011-02-02 | 19 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | 2011-02-02 | 20 PRAN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2011-02-02 | 21 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 