Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 75566066 |
Registration Number | 2616151 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Cancellation Code | 2 |
Attorney Name | Leonora Hoicka |
Attorney Docket Number | LOTUS 4290.0 |
Law Office Assigned | L60 |
Employee Name | TINGLEY, JOHN C |
1998-10-07 | Application Filed |
1999-04-30 | Date of First Use |
2002-06-18 | Published for Opposition |
2002-09-10 | Trademark Registered |
2008-12-04 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
2013-04-12 | Cancelled |
2013-04-12 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | International Business Machines Corporation |
Address | New Orchard Road Armonk NY 10504 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | NY |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 9 |
U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0091 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND DOWNLOADABLE COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES; SENDING AND RECEIVING ELECTRONIC MAIL, NETWORK CONFERENCING, INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, DATA PROCESSING, DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT AND ARCHIVING, AND TELEFAX CAPABILITIES ALL FOR USE ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR A LOCAL NETWORK AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-04-29 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-06-17 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1999-11-16 | 3 IUAF S: |
AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1999-12-30 | 4 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-11-16 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 2000-01-28 | 6 IUAA P: |
FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2000-06-01 | 7 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2001-01-10 | 8 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REINSTATED | 2001-03-09 | 9 REIN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-11-07 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 2001-06-26 | 11 CNCF O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2001-12-26 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-03-15 | 13 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-04-22 | 14 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-05-03 | 15 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2002-05-29 | 16 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2002-06-18 | 17 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2002-09-10 | 18 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-01-17 | 19 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2008-11-14 | 20 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2008-11-20 | 21 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2008-12-04 | 22 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2008-12-04 | 23 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2013-04-12 | 24 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.