Research |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Serial Number | 75515666 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Attorney Name | PHYLLIS SCHOENBERG |
Law Office Assigned | M30 |
Employee Name | PERRY, KIMBERLY B |
1998-07-08 | Application Filed |
2007-11-26 | Abandon |
2008-01-07 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
2008-01-07 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | ![]() |
Address | One Park Avenue New York DE 10016 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 16 |
U.S. Codes: | 002,005,022,023,029,037,038,050 |
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0161 | Printed publications, namely, magazines and newspapers and sections and columns thereof and supplements thereto, journals, newsletter, directories, pamphlets, brochures, indices and catalogues in the fields of computers, computing, computer hardware, computer software, computer technology, computer networks and networking,a worldwide computer information network, information technology, communications, communications technology, high technology, interactive and online services, entertainment, computer and video games, television programming, finance and news and a wide range of general interest information |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1998-12-16 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-02-09 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-02-17 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-08-17 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-08-17 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 2000-01-14 | 6 CNSL F:First Action |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-10-19 | 7 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-10-31 | 8 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2002-11-12 | 9 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-01-20 | 10 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2004-07-29 | 11 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2005-03-17 | 12 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2005-09-23 | 13 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-03-28 | 14 RCSC S: |
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-10-26 | 15 RCSC S: |
ASSIGNED TO LIE | 2007-05-05 | 16 ALIE A:Allowance for Publication |
LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2007-05-05 | 17 RCCK S: |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2007-05-23 | 18 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2007-05-23 | 19 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | 2007-06-08 | 20 UNDN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2008-01-07 | 21 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | 2008-01-07 | 22 MAB2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | 2008-01-25 | 23 UNDN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.