RISK+
Deltek, Inc.
Application Filed: 1998-06-17
Trademark Application Details
REGISTERED AND RENEWED
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75503895 |
| Registration Number | 2344552 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Domestic Representative | Sarah Tuchler |
| Attorney Name | G. Andrew Barger |
| Law Office Assigned | M60 |
| Employee Name | CLARK, GLENN G |
Timeline
| 1998-06-10 | Date of First Use |
| 1998-06-17 | Application Filed |
| 2000-02-01 | Published for Opposition |
| 2000-04-25 | Trademark Registered |
| 2010-04-24 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
| 2010-04-24 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2010-04-25 | Renewal Date |
| 2019-04-25 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  DELTEK, INC. |
| Address | 2291 Wood Oak Drive Herndon DE 20171 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 021,023,026,036,038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0091 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN USE IN PERFORMING A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION ON CRITICAL PATH SCHEDULE DATA TO DETERMINE THE PROBABILITY OF LOSS AND POSSIBLE OUTCOMES IN THE AEROSPACE, DEFENSE AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-01-25 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-01-28 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-02-03 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-08-03 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1999-11-04 | 5 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1999-12-30 | 6 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-02-01 | 7 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-04-25 | 8 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2006-04-04 | 9 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2006-04-25 | 10 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2006-04-25 | 11 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2006-07-19 | 12 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | 2006-07-21 | 13 PR23 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2006-08-09 | 14 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-01-22 | 15 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-01-22 | 16 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2007-01-22 | 17 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2007-02-02 | 18 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2007-02-14 | 19 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 15 | 2007-01-22 | 20 PR23 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-04-23 | 21 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-04-23 | 22 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2007-05-02 | 23 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2007-05-10 | 24 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2010-01-22 | 25 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2010-01-22 | 26 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2010-04-15 | 27 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2010-04-22 | 28 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2010-04-24 | 29 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2010-04-24 | 30 RNL1 Q: |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2010-12-15 | 31 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2011-11-28 | 32 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2011-11-28 | 33 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2012-10-17 | 34 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2012-10-31 | 35 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2015-07-08 | 36 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2017-01-11 | 37 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2017-03-22 | 38 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2017-04-27 | 39 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2017-04-27 | 40 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2019-04-25 | 41 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2021-11-05 | 42 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 