COMBI GEL
Permatec Technologie AG
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75399269 |
| Registration Number | 2464807 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 3 |
| Domestic Representative | KAUSHAL R ODEDRA |
| Attorney Name | KAUSHAL R ODEDRA |
| Attorney Docket Number | 1520.004/T(M |
| Law Office Assigned | L50 |
| Employee Name | JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE |
Timeline
| 1997-12-03 | Application Filed |
| 2001-04-10 | Published for Opposition |
| 2001-07-03 | Trademark Registered |
| 2004-08-24 | Cancelled |
| 2004-08-24 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2004-08-25 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Permatec Technologie AG |
| Address | c/o Treuhand Von Flue Grienbachstrasse 17 6301 ZUG CH |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CH |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 5 |
| U.S. Codes: | 006,018,044,046,051,052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| B00001 | In the statement, column 1, line 1, TECHNOLOGIES should be deleted, and , TECHNOLOGIE should be inserted. In the statement, column 1, line 11, DISORDERS should be deleted. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1998-07-30 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1998-08-03 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1998-08-05 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1998-08-05 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
| UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 1998-11-30 | 5 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-02-05 | 6 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-03-15 | 7 CNRT F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1999-10-11 | 8 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-06-07 | 9 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1999-12-21 | 10 CNRT F:First Action |
| Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | 2000-06-09 | 11 1.BD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2000-06-09 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2000-09-29 | 13 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-10-06 | 14 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2001-03-28 | 15 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2001-04-10 | 16 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2001-07-03 | 17 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | 2001-08-06 | 18 AMD7 I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION ISSUED | 2001-09-28 | 19 COC. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 2002-01-25 | 20 PETC T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | 2004-06-16 | 21 CANG T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2004-08-24 | 22 CANT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | 2004-08-24 | 23 C18. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 