Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 75361988 |
Registration Number | 2334199 |
Mark Drawing Code | 3S13: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
Attorney Name | Dave Tyner |
Law Office Assigned | L90 |
Employee Name | CAPSHAW, DANIEL |
1997-02-21 | Date of First Use |
1997-09-24 | Application Filed |
1998-10-06 | Published for Opposition |
2000-03-28 | Trademark Registered |
2010-01-29 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
2010-01-29 | Status: Live/Registered |
2010-03-28 | Renewal Date |
2019-03-28 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | PICCADILLY HOLDINGS LLC |
Address | 4150 S. SHERWOOD FOREST BLVD. SUITE 100 BATON ROUGE DE 70816 |
Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
Legal Entity State | DE |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
260301 | Ovals as carriers and single line borders |
261707 | Heat, lines depicting; Lines depicting speed, propulsion, heat or wind; Propulsion, lines depicting; Speed, lines depicting; Wind, lines depicting |
International Codes: | 42 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
D10000 | "EXPRESS" |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1998-06-11 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | 1998-07-22 | 2 CNEA F:First Action |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1998-07-28 | 3 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1998-09-04 | 4 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1998-10-06 | 5 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 1998-10-23 | 6 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | 1999-10-19 | 7 OP.I T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | 2000-02-11 | 8 OP.D T:TTAB Proceeding |
OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | 2000-02-11 | 9 OP.T T:TTAB Proceeding |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-03-28 | 10 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | 2006-03-28 | 11 E815 I:Incoming Correspondence |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2006-04-11 | 12 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2006-03-28 | 13 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2006-06-21 | 14 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2006-06-24 | 15 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2007-04-25 | 16 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2010-01-14 | 17 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2010-01-29 | 18 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2010-01-29 | 19 RNL1 Q: |
AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2017-08-02 | 20 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2018-04-06 | 21 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2018-04-06 | 22 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2019-03-28 | 23 REM2 E:E-Mail |
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2021-10-29 | 24 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.