THE NAME THAT IS WORTH A THOUSAND PICTURES
Panavision Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75246991 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | ROBERT E LYON |
| Attorney Docket Number | 223.281 |
| Law Office Assigned | L30 |
| Employee Name | THOMPSON, HEATHER |
Timeline
| 1997-02-24 | Application Filed |
| 1997-09-00 | Date of First Use |
| 2000-04-25 | Published for Opposition |
| 2002-10-28 | Abandon |
| 2002-11-20 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2002-11-21 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  PANAVISION INC. |
| Address | 6219 De Soto Avenue Woodland Hills DE 91367 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 41 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101,107 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0411 | leasing, renting and subleasing of photographic and cinematographic equipment, lighting equipment, lenses and other related cinematographic equipment, all for the use in the production and/or filming of motion pictures for cinema and television; the provision of technical information relating to the use of cinematographic motion picture production and filming equipment; and the provision of motion picture production studios and studio space |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1997-09-18 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1997-09-18 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1997-09-25 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-03-27 | 4 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1998-05-22 | 5 CNRT F:First Action |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1998-11-23 | 6 CNSL F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1999-11-19 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | 2000-02-16 | 8 CNEA F:First Action |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2000-02-17 | 9 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 2000-03-24 | 10 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2000-04-25 | 11 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 2000-07-18 | 12 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXTENSION 1 FILED | 2001-01-10 | 13 EXT1 S: |
| EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | 2001-02-23 | 14 EX1G S: |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 2001-07-16 | 15 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2001-07-16 | 16 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-08-07 | 17 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2001-08-08 | 18 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2001-08-13 | 19 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2002-02-19 | 20 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 2002-04-25 | 21 CNRT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | 2002-11-20 | 22 ABN2 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 