VISION
Taghleef Industries Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75130887 |
| Registration Number | 2057521 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Martin L. Faigus |
| Attorney Docket Number | A1019 30063 |
| Law Office Assigned | L80 |
| Employee Name | GEORGE, ANIL V |
Timeline
| 1991-06-21 | Date of First Use |
| 1996-07-08 | Application Filed |
| 1997-02-04 | Published for Opposition |
| 1997-04-29 | Trademark Registered |
| 2007-04-29 | Renewal Date |
| 2007-06-10 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2007-06-10 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  TAGHLEEF INDUSTRIES INC. |
| Address | 2751 CENTERVILLE ROAD SUITE 400 WILMINGTON DE 19808 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 17 |
| U.S. Codes: | 001,005,012,013,035,050 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0171 | plastic film used in the manufacture of labels |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1996-11-04 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1996-11-12 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | 1996-11-29 | 3 CNEA F:First Action |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1996-12-03 | 4 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1997-01-04 | 5 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1997-02-04 | 6 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1997-04-29 | 7 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2002-10-31 | 8 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2002-10-31 | 9 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2002-12-30 | 10 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-12-05 | 11 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2006-10-12 | 12 CORV P: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2006-12-11 | 13 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2007-04-23 | 14 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2007-04-23 | 15 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2007-05-23 | 16 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2007-06-10 | 17 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2007-06-10 | 18 RNL1 Q: |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2007-09-05 | 19 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2007-09-12 | 20 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2013-03-13 | 21 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2016-05-25 | 22 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2020-05-01 | 23 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 