ABACUS
Ventyx Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 75010240 |
| Registration Number | 2246899 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | MARY L. SHAPIRO |
| Attorney Docket Number | 081604-00270 |
| Law Office Assigned | L30 |
| Employee Name | SCHULMAN, LORI |
Timeline
| 1995-03-00 | Date of First Use |
| 1995-10-25 | Application Filed |
| 1997-07-22 | Published for Opposition |
| 1999-05-25 | Trademark Registered |
| 2005-06-29 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2009-12-26 | Cancelled |
| 2009-12-26 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  VENTYX INC. |
| Address | 3301 WINDY RIDGE PARKWAY ATLANTA DE 30339 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0421 | software consulting services, namely the design, programming, updating and implementation of computer software that helps manage and control all phases of the reorganized manufacturing processes of large process industrial concerns that convert raw materials into finished products |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1996-05-03 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1996-05-23 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1996-11-25 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1997-05-06 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1997-05-06 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1997-05-21 | 6 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1997-06-20 | 7 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1997-07-22 | 8 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 1997-08-04 | 9 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1999-05-25 | 10 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-06-23 | 11 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2003-06-23 | 12 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2004-02-13 | 13 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2005-05-26 | 14 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2005-05-26 | 15 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | 2005-06-29 | 16 PLGL A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2005-06-29 | 17 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2005-11-15 | 18 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2007-01-17 | 19 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2007-06-13 | 20 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2009-12-26 | 21 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 