Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 74721590 |
Registration Number | 2046626 |
Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Domestic Representative | GITI Tire (USA) Ltd. |
Attorney Name | Daniel M. Cislo, Esq. |
Attorney Docket Number | 07-17843 |
Law Office Assigned | L40 |
Employee Name | MCMORROW, JANICE LEE |
1995-08-28 | Application Filed |
1995-12-31 | Date of First Use |
1996-05-21 | Published for Opposition |
1997-03-18 | Trademark Registered |
2016-07-25 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
2016-07-25 | Status: Live/Registered |
2017-03-18 | Renewal Date |
2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | GITI TIRE PTE. LTD INCORPORATED |
Address | 9 OXLEY RISE, NO. 01-02 THE OXLEY SINGAPORE SG 283697 |
Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
Legal Entity State | SG |
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
International Codes: | 12 |
U.S. Codes: | 019,021,023,031,035,044 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0121 | automotive vehicle tires |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1996-03-05 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1996-03-12 | 2 CNSA P: |
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1996-04-19 | 3 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1996-05-21 | 4 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 1996-08-13 | 5 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1996-10-15 | 6 IUAF S: |
STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1996-12-05 | 7 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1996-08-15 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 1997-01-12 | 9 CNPR P: |
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1997-03-18 | 10 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
PAPER RECEIVED | 2003-01-21 | 11 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 2003-01-21 | 12 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 2003-04-18 | 13 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2006-11-17 | 14 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2006-11-17 | 15 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2006-12-19 | 16 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2007-02-06 | 17 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2007-02-06 | 18 RNL1 Q: |
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2015-03-13 | 19 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2016-03-18 | 20 REM2 E:E-Mail |
TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2016-05-06 | 21 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2016-07-25 | 22 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2016-07-25 | 23 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2016-07-25 | 24 RNL2 Q: |
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2016-07-25 | 25 NA89 E:E-Mail |
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2017-06-07 | 26 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.