Trademark Filing
Ennco Display Systems, Inc.
| Serial Number | 74439614 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 2000: Illustration: Drawing or design without any word(s)/letter(s)/ number(s) |
| Attorney Name | James R. Vance |
| Attorney Docket Number | ENNC-200 |
| Law Office Assigned | L20 |
| Employee Name | ATCHISON, ALAN C |
Timeline
| 1992-10-12 | Date of First Use |
| 1993-09-24 | Application Filed |
| 2000-04-06 | Abandon |
| 2000-04-06 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2001-03-21 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Ennco Display Systems, Inc. |
| Address | 6975 - 176th Avenue NE, Suite 350 Redmond WA 98052 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | WA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 160325 | Crosshairs; Gun sights; Viewers, slide, hand |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 9 |
| U.S. Codes: | 002,026 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| DM0000 | The mark consists of the configuration of an eyeglass/spectacle frame display holder. The dotted lines shown in the drawing with respect to the face portion and inverted U-shaped or V-shaped portion of the eyeglass/spectacle frame display holder and the semi-cylindrical rod holder do not form part of the mark but merely represent a three-dimensional projection of related surfaces that are positioned behind those portions of the configuration. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1994-01-28 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1994-02-18 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1994-03-14 | 3 CNRT F:First Action |
| UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | 1994-05-02 | 4 UNPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1994-09-14 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1994-12-19 | 6 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1995-01-26 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1995-05-15 | 8 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 1995-12-18 | 9 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1996-04-04 | 10 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1996-08-26 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1997-01-13 | 12 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1997-02-11 | 13 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | 1997-05-12 | 14 CNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1997-09-10 | 15 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1998-03-16 | 16 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1998-11-25 | 17 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | 1999-05-21 | 18 CNES O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | 2000-04-06 | 19 EXPA T:TTAB Proceeding |
| EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | 2000-07-21 | 20 EXPT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | 2000-04-06 | 21 ABN3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 