MISSOURI SERIES
MBNA America Bank, National Association
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74417536 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Randel S. Springer |
| Law Office Assigned | L60 |
| Employee Name | COWARD, JEFFERY |
Timeline
| 1993-07-00 | Date of First Use |
| 1993-07-27 | Application Filed |
| 2006-01-19 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 |
| 2006-04-29 | Abandon |
| 2006-05-01 | Status: Dead/Abandoned |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  MBNA America Bank, National Association |
| Entity Statement | BANKING ASSOCIATION |
| Address | 400 Christiana Road Newark DE US 19713 |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | US |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 36 |
| U.S. Codes: | 102 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0361 | credit card services |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1994-01-13 | 1 CNRT F:First Action |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1994-05-13 | 2 IUAF S: |
| AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1994-06-21 | 3 AUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1994-06-28 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | 1994-06-28 | 5 IUAA P: |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1994-06-29 | 6 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1994-08-31 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1994-11-22 | 8 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1994-11-28 | 9 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1995-06-01 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1995-07-24 | 11 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1996-01-26 | 12 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | 1996-08-21 | 13 CNSL F:First Action |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1997-10-21 | 14 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2004-03-25 | 15 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2004-09-07 | 16 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2004-09-07 | 17 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2005-03-11 | 18 RCSC S: |
| LIE CHECKED SUSP - TO ATTY FOR ACTION | 2006-01-19 | 19 RCCK S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-02-09 | 20 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-02-09 | 21 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2006-02-09 | 22 RCSC S: |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2006-04-18 | 23 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2006-04-18 | 24 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | 2006-04-29 | 25 EXAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | 2006-05-01 | 26 ABN1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | 2006-05-01 | 27 MAB1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 