ACC
Candle Corporation
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 74399519 |
| Registration Number | 2055671 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | JULIET L REAM |
| Law Office Assigned | L10 |
| Employee Name | PRICE, JERRY L |
Timeline
| 1993-06-09 | Application Filed |
| 1993-10-01 | Date of First Use |
| 1995-05-16 | Published for Opposition |
| 1997-04-22 | Trademark Registered |
| 1997-04-29 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2004-01-24 | Cancelled |
| 2004-01-24 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Candle Corporation |
| Address | 2425 Olympic Boulevard Santa Monica CA 90404 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0421 | computer software design for others, namely software for use in a customized integrated enterprise status and alert system; and computer consultation, namely providing a system of computer software panels with navigation paths to address enterprise systems management objectives, provide information on usage of the customized system, provide information recommending software and data elements used to drive the status and alert system, providing an estimate of effort required to implement the system in production and provide a proposed roll out schedule and a systems assurance review to ensure connectivity between the computer software modules |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1993-09-21 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1993-10-27 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1994-02-14 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1994-04-26 | 4 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1994-12-05 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | 1994-12-16 | 6 EXPI T:TTAB Proceeding |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1995-01-09 | 7 CNSA P: |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1995-04-14 | 8 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1995-05-16 | 9 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | 1995-06-12 | 10 ETOF T:TTAB Proceeding |
| NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | 1996-06-25 | 11 NOAM O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| USE AMENDMENT FILED | 1996-08-12 | 12 IUAF S: |
| STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | 1996-10-29 | 13 SUPC I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1996-11-04 | 14 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1996-12-24 | 15 CNRT S: |
| ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | 1997-02-01 | 16 CNPR P: |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1997-04-22 | 17 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2002-12-05 | 18 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | 2004-01-24 | 19 C8.. O:Outgoing Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 