OPERATING SYSTEM/450

International Business Machines Corporation

Application Filed: 1989-11-16

Trademark Application Details

Mark For: OPERATING SYSTEM/450™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of operating system software for computers, and instruction manuals sold or distributed therewith.

Status

2021-08-04 UTC

DEAD APPLICATION Refused Dismissed or Invalidated

This trademark application was refused, dismissed, or invalidated by the Office and this application is no longer active.

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	74002830
Mark Literal Elements	OPERATING SYSTEM/450
Mark Drawing Type	1 - TYPESET WORD(S) /LETTER(S) /NUMBER(S)
Mark Type	Trademark
Standard Character Claim	No
Current Location	FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) 1992-06-18
Basis	1(b)
Class Status	ABANDONED
Primary International Class	009 - Primary Class (Electrical and scientific apparatus) Scientific, nautical, surveying, electric, photographic, cinematographic, optical, weighing, measuring, signaling, checking (supervision), lifesaving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; magnetic data carriers, recording discs; automatic vending machines and mechanisms for coin operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating machines, data processing equipment and computers; fire-extinguishing apparatus.
Filed Use	No
Current Use	No
Intent To Use	Yes
Filed ITU	Yes
44D Filed	No
44E Current	No
66A Current	No
Current Basis	No
No Basis	No
Attorney Name	JOYCE M. DONER
Attorney Docket Number	HQ5-89-024
Law Office Assigned	J30
Employee Name	GOLD, BARBARA A

Timeline

1989-11-16	Application Filed
1990-04-24	Published
1990-04-24	Published for Opposition
1992-04-16	Abandon
1992-04-16	Status: Abandoned because no Statement of Use or Extension Request timely filed after Notice of Allowance was issued. To view all docume
1992-04-16	Status: Dead/Abandoned
1992-06-18	Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
2018-07-08	Transaction Date

Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)

Party:	INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Address	OLD ORCHARD ROAD ARMONK, NEW YORK UNITED STATES 10504
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	NEW YORK

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

JOYCE M. DONER
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP.
2000 PURCHASE STREET
PURCHASE, NEW YORK 10577

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	9
U.S. Codes:	038
International Codes:	16
U.S. Codes:	038

Type Code	Type
GS0161	COMPUTER SOFTWARE INSTRUCTION MANUALS FOR USE WITH OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTERS

Related Filings

Mark	Serial Number	Relationship Number
OS/2	73655829	1517668
OPERATING SYSTEM/2	73655935	1524995
OS/400	73735155	1556606
OPERATING SYSTEM/400	73735157	1556607

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Proceeding Number
ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	1992-04-16
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	1991-10-15
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	1991-09-17
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	1990-04-24
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	1990-03-24
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	1990-02-02
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED	1990-01-30
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	1990-01-25	66384

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.