CHILI PUPS
Krystal Company, The
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 73839598 |
| Registration Number | 1652807 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 5R17: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Stylized form |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | Michael F. Brown |
| Law Office Assigned | G60 |
| Employee Name | APPLEWHITE, FRANCINE |
Timeline
| 1989-06-09 | Date of First Use |
| 1989-11-15 | Application Filed |
| 1991-03-07 | Amend to Register |
| 1991-07-30 | Trademark Registered |
| 2001-07-30 | Renewal Date |
| 2012-03-19 | Cancelled |
| 2012-03-19 | Location: POST REGISTRATION |
| 2012-03-19 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  KRYSTAL COMPANY, THE |
| Address | THE KRYSTAL BUILDING UNION SQUARE CHATTANOOGA TN 37402 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | NV |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 30 |
| U.S. Codes: | 046 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0301 | FRANKFURTER SANDWICHES CONTAINING CHILI FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1990-01-10 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1990-03-09 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1990-05-07 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1990-08-02 | 4 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1990-11-23 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1990-12-27 | 6 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | 1991-01-11 | 7 ZZZZ Z:Deletion |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1991-02-11 | 8 CNRT F:First Action |
| JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | 1991-03-26 | 9 JURT T:TTAB Proceeding |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1991-03-07 | 10 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 1991-04-10 | 11 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 1991-07-30 | 12 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | 1996-09-17 | 13 8.AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 1996-11-25 | 14 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2000-08-10 | 15 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2001-02-21 | 16 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2001-02-21 | 17 RNL1 Q: |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2007-11-05 | 18 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2007-11-05 | 19 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | 2007-11-07 | 20 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2009-01-08 | 21 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | 2012-03-19 | 22 C8.T O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | 2012-03-28 | 23 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 