MATTRESS LAND
Carpetland, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 73798118 |
| Registration Number | 1632665 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Angela Washelesky |
| Law Office Assigned | 570 |
| Employee Name | WHITAKER, LAURIE |
Timeline
| 1985-04-20 | Date of First Use |
| 1989-05-05 | Application Filed |
| 1990-10-30 | Published for Opposition |
| 1991-01-22 | Trademark Registered |
| 2011-01-22 | Renewal Date |
| 2011-01-27 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
| 2011-01-27 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2018-07-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  CARPETLAND, INC. |
| Address | 2030 DUKE STREET ALEXANDRIA DC 22314 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | VA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0421 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MATTRESSES AND RELATED BEDDING PRODUCTS |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1989-06-25 | 1 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1989-07-13 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1989-07-25 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1989-08-10 | 4 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1990-02-09 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1990-03-06 | 6 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1990-08-10 | 7 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1990-08-17 | 8 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | 1990-09-29 | 9 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 1990-10-30 | 10 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 1991-01-22 | 11 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | 1997-01-14 | 12 815F I:Incoming Correspondence |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | 1997-02-13 | 13 PR23 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 1997-04-09 | 14 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2001-01-22 | 15 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2001-08-25 | 16 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2001-08-25 | 17 RNL1 Q: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-12-15 | 18 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2009-08-26 | 19 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2011-01-21 | 20 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2011-01-27 | 21 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2011-01-27 | 22 RNL2 Q: |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2020-01-22 | 23 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2021-10-22 | 24 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 