DRYLETE

Hind, Inc.

Application Filed: 1989-03-03

Trademark Application Details

Status

800

Live/Registered

REGISTERED AND RENEWED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	73784357
Registration Number	1561106
Mark Drawing Code	1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s)
Attorney Name	Amber M. Underhill
Law Office Assigned	550

Timeline

1989-02-09	Date of First Use
1989-03-03	Application Filed
1989-07-25	Published for Opposition
1989-10-17	Trademark Registered
2009-10-17	Renewal Date
2009-11-06	Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE
2009-11-06	Status: Live/Registered
2018-10-17	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	HIND, INC.
Address	P.O. BOX 12609 SAN LUIS OBISPO CA 93406
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	MA

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

Amber M. Underhill
Warner Norcross + Judd LLP
900 Fifth Third Center
111 Lyon Street NW
Grand Rapids MI 49503

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	25
U.S. Codes:	039

Type Code	Type
PM0001	DRY-LETE

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	1989-05-08	1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner
EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED	1989-05-09	2 CNEA F:First Action
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	1989-05-15	3 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	1989-06-24	4 NPUB O:Outgoing Correspondence
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	1989-07-25	5 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication
REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER	1989-10-17	6 R.PR A:Allowance for Publication
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED	1995-01-12	7 815F I:Incoming Correspondence
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.	1995-09-08	8 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	2007-11-16	9 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	2008-04-30	10 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence
CASE FILE IN TICRS	2009-03-11	11 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED	2009-10-16	12 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence
CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL	2009-11-04	13 APRE A:Allowance for Publication
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED	2009-11-06	14 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)	2009-11-06	15 RNL1 Q:
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	2012-10-10	16 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	2012-10-10	17 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	2012-10-17	18 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence
ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY	2013-05-01	19 ASCK I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	2016-07-11	20 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence
APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	2016-07-11	21 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	2018-08-29	22 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	2018-08-29	23 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence
COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED	2018-10-17	24 REM2 E:E-Mail
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9	2021-10-15	25 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.