SKILL LEARNING SYSTEMS
Productivity Training Corporation
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 73346254 |
| Registration Number | 1288466 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Cancellation Code | 2 |
| Attorney Name | KARL D. CHANDLER |
| Law Office Assigned | 510 |
| Employee Name | MACK, MARY C |
Timeline
| 1979-02-19 | Date of First Use |
| 1982-01-18 | Application Filed |
| 1984-03-30 | Amend to Register |
| 1984-07-31 | Published for Opposition |
| 1984-07-31 | Trademark Registered |
| 2004-07-31 | Renewal Date |
| 2011-03-24 | Location: SCANNING ON DEMAND |
| 2016-03-25 | Cancelled |
| 2016-03-25 | Status: Dead/Cancelled |
| 2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Productivity Training Corporation |
| Address | 2430 Charleston Rd. Mountain View CA 94043 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | CA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 16 |
| U.S. Codes: | 038 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0161 | Instructional and Teaching Materials in the Nature of Learning Systems Consisting of Video Tapes, Printed Manuals, Sample Molds, Scale Models, Sold as a Unit, and Used for Training Dental Laboratory Technicians and for Increasing Their Productivity |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 1982-05-12 | 1 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | 1982-05-21 | 2 CNRT F:First Action |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1983-07-29 | 3 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | 1983-09-30 | 4 CNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 1984-03-30 | 5 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 1984-04-06 | 6 CNTA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | 1984-07-31 | 7 R.SR A:Allowance for Publication |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | 1990-07-30 | 8 8.AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 1990-09-26 | 9 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2002-04-25 | 10 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2003-06-17 | 11 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2004-07-28 | 12 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2004-07-28 | 13 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2004-09-16 | 14 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2004-09-16 | 15 RNL1 Q: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2011-03-07 | 16 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2011-03-24 | 17 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | 2011-12-14 | 18 EWAF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | 2011-12-21 | 19 CORV 4: |
| CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | 2016-03-25 | 20 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 