THRIFTY MINT
Carroll Company
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 73139924 |
| Registration Number | 1096437 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
Timeline
| 1957-03-20 | Date of First Use |
| 1977-09-02 | Application Filed |
| 1978-07-18 | Trademark Registered |
| 1999-04-27 | Status: Dead/Expired |
| 2002-10-18 | Location: FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA) |
| 2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  CARROLL COMPANY |
| Address | 2900 W. KINGSLEY ROAD GARLAND TX 75041 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | TX |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 5 |
| U.S. Codes: | 006 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0051 | DISINFECTANT FOR USE ON TOILETS, URINALS, LAVATORIES, SHOWER STALLS, FLOORS, WALLS, REFRIGERATORS, RUBBER AND PLASTIC SURFACES |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | 1983-11-22 | 1 8.OK O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| EXPIRED SEC. 9 | 1999-04-27 | 2 EXRG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 