INTUMASTIC

Carboline Company

Application Filed: 1971-11-22

Trademark Application Details

Status

800

Live/Registered

REGISTERED AND RENEWED

Research	OneLook Acronym Finder
Serial Number	72408337
Registration Number	0969034
Mark Drawing Code	1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s)
Attorney Name	Raymond Rundelli
Attorney Docket Number	06821/08003

Timeline

1971-07-28	Date of First Use
1971-11-22	Application Filed
1973-09-25	Trademark Registered
2013-09-25	Renewal Date
2013-09-26	Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE
2013-09-26	Status: Live/Registered
2018-07-07	Transaction Date

Trademark Applicants & Owners

Owner:	CARBOLINE COMPANY
Address	328 HANLEY INDUSTRIAL COURT ST. LOUIS MO 63144
Legal Entity Type	Corporation
Legal Entity State	DE

Documents

Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.

Attorney of Record

Raymond Rundelli
CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP
The Calfee Building
1405 East Sixth Street
Cleveland OH 44114-1607

Good, Services, and Codes

International Codes:	2
U.S. Codes:	016

Type Code	Type
GS0161	FIRE RETARDANT COATINGS

Trademark Filing History

Description	Date	Event Coding
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.	1979-03-05	1 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence
REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8	1993-04-15	2 9.AF I:Incoming Correspondence
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)	1993-08-19	3 RNL1 Q:
TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED	2002-09-25	4 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence
REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED	2002-09-25	5 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED	2003-01-15	6 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)	2003-01-15	7 RNL2 Q:
TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	2007-11-27	8 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence
ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	2007-11-27	9 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence
CASE FILE IN TICRS	2008-08-14	10 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	2009-05-06	11 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence
APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	2009-05-06	12 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED	2009-05-06	13 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence
APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	2009-05-06	14 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence
AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	2009-10-28	15 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence
AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP	2009-11-04	16 ASGN I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	2012-02-17	17 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence
TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED	2013-09-23	18 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence
REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED	2013-09-23	19 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence
REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED	2013-09-26	20 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence
REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS)	2013-09-26	21 RNL3 Q:
NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED	2013-09-26	22 NA89 E:E-Mail
COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED	2022-09-25	23 REM2 E:E-Mail
CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9	2024-04-05	24 CAEX O:Outgoing Correspondence

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.