CONTRAD
Decon Laboratories Limited
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 72392851 |
| Registration Number | 0932987 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 1000: Typeset: Word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | EUGENE E. RENZ, JR. |
| Law Office Assigned | 560 |
Timeline
| 1970-03-24 | Date of First Use |
| 1971-05-24 | Application Filed |
| 1972-04-25 | Trademark Registered |
| 2012-03-21 | Location: GENERIC WEB UPDATE |
| 2012-03-21 | Status: Live/Registered |
| 2012-04-25 | Renewal Date |
| 2018-07-07 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  DECON LABORATORIES LIMITED |
| Address | ELLEN ST. PORTSLADE, BRIGHTO GB2 |
| Legal Entity Type | Company |
| Legal Entity State | PA |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 3 |
| U.S. Codes: | 052 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0521 | CLEANING AND DECONTAMINATING LABORATORY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS OF RADIOACTIVE CONTAMINANTS |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | 1977-09-19 | 1 C15A O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 9 FILED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | 1992-03-18 | 2 9.AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 9 | 1992-05-15 | 3 PRA9 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | 1992-06-15 | 4 RRPR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 1992-08-04 | 5 RNL1 Q: |
| REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | 2002-01-25 | 6 89AF I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2002-03-20 | 7 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2002-03-20 | 8 RNL2 Q: |
| PAPER RECEIVED | 2006-08-15 | 9 MAIL I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | 2006-09-02 | 10 CORV P: |
| CASE FILE IN TICRS | 2008-09-12 | 11 CFIT O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2012-03-20 | 12 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2012-03-20 | 13 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2012-03-21 | 14 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (THIRD RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2012-03-21 | 15 RNL3 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2012-03-21 | 16 NA89 E:E-Mail |
| COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | 2021-04-25 | 17 REM2 E:E-Mail |
| TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | 2022-07-12 | 18 E89R I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | 2023-01-26 | 19 APRE A:Allowance for Publication |
| POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | 2023-02-22 | 20 PR89 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | 2023-04-17 | 21 EROP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | 2023-04-18 | 22 89AG O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FOURTH RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | 2023-04-18 | 23 RNL4 Q: |
| NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | 2023-04-18 | 24 NA89 E:E-Mail |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 