Categories
Trademark Protection

Similarity of Marks

To determine whether a likelihood of confusion exists, the marks are first examined for their similarities and differences. Note that in order to find a likelihood of confusion, the marks do not have to be identical. When marks sound alike when spoken, are visually similar, have the same meaning (even if in translation), and/or create the same general commercial impression in the consuming public’s mind, the marks may be considered confusingly similar. Similarity in sound, appearance, and/or meaning may be sufficient to support a finding of likelihood of confusion, depending on the relatedness of the goods and/or services.

The following are examples of marks that would be considered similar:

Sound

Although spelled differently, the marks sound alike; i.e., they are “phonetic equivalents.”

Appearance

The marks look very similar, even though the one on the right uses a stylized font.

Meaning

The marks are similar because, when the Italian word “LUPO” is translated into English, it means “WOLF.”

Commercial Impression

Because the marks include the same design element, they create a similar overall commercial impression, even though the one on the right also includes words plus the design.

General

The marks convey a similar general meaning and produce the same mental reaction.

Categories
Trademark Protection

Likelihood of Confusion with Other Marks

The USPTO examines every application for compliance with federal law and rules. The most common reason to refuse registration is a “likelihood of confusion” between the mark of the applicant and a mark already registered or in a prior-filed pending application owned by another party. The USPTO determines that a likelihood of confusion exists when both (1) the marks are similar, and (2) the goods and/or services of the parties are related such that consumers would mistakenly believe they come from the same source. Similar marks or related goods/services by themselves are not enough to support a finding of a likelihood of confusion, unless a court has held that the mark is actually a famous mark. That is, generally two identical marks can coexist, so long as the goods and services are not related.

Each application is decided on its own facts and no simple mechanical test is used to determine whether a likelihood of confusion exists. Therefore, before filing your non-refundable application, it is very important for you to determine whether your proposed mark is likely to cause confusion with another mark. This determination can be made only after doing a thorough trademark search.

Categories
Trademark Protection

Consideration for Federal Registration When Selecting a Mark

Once you determine that the type of protection you need is, in fact, trademark protection, then selecting a mark is the very first step in the overall application/registration process. This must be done with thought and care, because not every mark is registrable with the USPTO. Nor is every mark legally protectable. That is, some marks may not be capable of serving as the basis for a legal claim by the owner seeking to stop others from using a similar mark on related goods or services.

Businesses and individuals new to trademarks and the application/ registration process often choose a mark for their product or service that may be difficult or even impossible to register and/or protect for various reasons. Before filing a trademark/service mark application, you should consider (1) whether the mark you want to register is registrable, and (2) how difficult it will be to protect your mark based on the strength of the mark selected. Note in this regard that the USPTO only registers marks. You, as the mark owner, are solely responsible for enforcement.

Below are some factors to consider when choosing a mark. While the USPTO can provide the following general guidance, the agency does not advise you in advance of your filing an application whether your specific mark is registrable.

Categories
Trademark Protection

How do domain names, business name registrations, and trademarks differ?

A domain name is part of a web address that links to the internet protocol address (IP address) of a particular website. For example, in the web address “http://www.uspto.gov,” the domain name is “uspto.gov.” You register your domain name with an accredited domain name registrar, not through the USPTO. A domain name and a trademark differ. A trademark identifies goods or services as being from a particular source. Use of a domain name only as part of a web address does not qualify as source-indicating trademark use, though other prominent use apart from the web address may qualify as trademark use. Registration of a domain name with a domain name registrar does not give you any trademark rights. For example, even if you register a certain domain name with a domain name registrar, you could later be required to surrender it if it infringes someone else’s trademark rights.

Similarly, use of a business name does not necessarily qualify as trademark use, though other use of a business name as the source of goods or services may qualify it as both a business name and a trademark. Many states and local jurisdictions register business names, either as part of obtaining a certificate to do business or as an assumed name filing. For example, in a state where you will be doing business, you might file documents (typically with a state corporation commission or state division of corporations) to form a business entity, such as a corporation or limited liability company. You would select a name for your entity, for example, XYZ, Inc. If no other company has already applied for that exact name in that state and you comply with all other requirements, the state likely would issue you a certificate and authorize you to do business under that name. However, a state’s authorization to form a business with a particular name does not also give you trademark rights and other parties could later try to prevent your use of the business name if they believe a likelihood of confusion exists with their trademarks.

Categories
Trademark Protection

Do Trademarks, Copyrights, and Patents protect the same things?

No. Trademarks, copyrights, and patents protect different types of intellectual property. A trademark typically protects brand names and logos used on goods and services. A copyright protects an original artistic or literary work. A patent protects an invention. For example, if you invent a new kind of vacuum cleaner, you would apply for a patent to protect the invention itself. You would apply to register a trademark to protect the brand name of the vacuum cleaner. And you might register a copyright for the TV commercial that you use to market the product.

For copyright information, go to copyright.gov. For patent information, go to uspto.gov/patents.

Categories
Trademark Protection

What is a Trademark or Service mark?

Trademark:
A trademark is generally a word, phrase, symbol, or design, or a combination thereof, that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods of one party from those of others.

Service Mark:
A service mark is the same as a trademark, except that it identifies and distinguishes the source of a service rather than goods. Throughout this booklet, the terms “trademark” and “mark” refer to both trademarks and service marks.

Categories
FITF

Patent “Effectively Filed Date”

The effectively filed date of subject matter in a U.S. patent or published application as prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) is the earlier of:

1) the actual filing date of the U.S. patent or published application being used as the reference
or
2) the filing date of the earliest application to which the U.S. patent or published application being used as the reference is entitled to claim a right of foreign priority or domestic benefit which describes the subject matter.

Effectively Filed Date
Illustration 4: Effectively Filed Date of a Reference Under AIA 102(a)(2)

Jackson’s patent application publication is being considered as possible prior art against claims in an AIA application.

Jackson’s prior art patent application publication was effectively filed on June 5, 2011, which is the filing date of the foreign priority application.

Categories
FITF

Patent “Grace Period”

The grace period is the one year time period before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, which can be the foreign priority filing date.

The concept of a grace period is taken from the language of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(1) which defines exceptions to public disclosures as set forth in 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1).

Grace Period
Illustration 3: Grace Period Under 35 U.S.C. 102 (b)(1)

Categories
FITF

Definition of Effective Filing Date in an AIA Application

The effective filing date of a claimed invention in an AIA application (other than reissue applications) is the earlier of:

(1) the actual filing date of the application
or
(2) the filing date of the earliest application for which the application is entitled, as to such invention, to a right of foreign priority or the domestic benefit of an earlier filing date.

Effective Filing
Illustration 2: Effective Filing Date

Effective filing date for Taylor’s invention X is July 1, 2013, which is the filing date of the foreign priority application

Categories
FITF

Definition of Claimed Invention

The claimed invention is the subject matter defined by a claim in a patent or an application for a patent.