InnoMed One, LLC
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Innomed One, Llc. Innomed One, Llc has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "SEMSECURE"
- Company Aliases
- InnoMed One, LLC
- InnoMed One, LLC - Mobile AL US
| State Incorporated | ALABAMA |
| Entity Type | LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY |
| Address | 1100-A Dauphin Street Mobile, ALABAMA UNITED STATES 36604 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION 20210153901 - 16/349159 PLESSALA; KIRBY J. ; et al. | 2021-05-27 |
| DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION 20210128198 - 17/146658 PLESSALA; KIRBY J. ; et al. | 2021-05-06 |
| DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION 20200289160 - 16/767680 PLESSALA; KIRBY J. ; et al. | 2020-09-17 |
| ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE 20200022728 - 16/535506 Plessala; Kirby J. ; et al. | 2020-01-23 |
| DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION 20190282271 - 16/349159 PLESSALA; KIRBY J. ; et al. | 2019-09-19 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"SEMSECURE" 90171533 |
SEMSECURE 2020-09-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 